Country | Inject | Smoke/inhale | Eat/drink | Sniff | Others | Route known (n) | Route unknown | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Belgium | 0.0 | 0.0 | 97.2 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 179 | 7 | |
Bulgaria | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50 | 0 | |
Czech Republic | 0.0 | 0.0 | 96.8 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 31 | 1 | |
Denmark | 0.0 | 1.9 | 96.2 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 53 | 8 | |
Germany | 5.0 | 1.2 | 90.7 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 7080 | : | |
Estonia | : | : | : | : | : | : | : | |
Ireland | 1 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 99.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 198 | 0 |
Greece | 0.0 | 1.8 | 96.5 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 57 | 0 | |
Spain | 1 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 97.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 912 | 32 |
France | 1.8 | : | 94.2 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 624 | 126 | |
Italy | 2 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 93.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 213 | 0 |
Cyprus | 0.0 | 15.8 | 84.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 19 | 0 | |
Latvia | 3 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 95.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 105 | 4 |
Lithuania | : | : | : | : | : | : | : | |
Luxembourg | : | : | : | : | : | : | : | |
Hungary | 0.0 | 1.6 | 95.3 | 3.1 | 0.0 | 64 | 1 | |
Malta | : | : | : | : | : | : | : | |
Netherlands | 0.6 | 1.1 | 98.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 362 | 224 | |
Austria | 4.8 | 0.0 | 90.5 | 4.8 | 0.0 | 63 | 4 | |
Poland | 4 | : | : | 50.0 | : | 50.0 | 8 | : |
Portugal | 5 | 7.1 | 0.0 | 92.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 14 | 8 |
Romania | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2 | 0 | |
Slovenia | : | : | 100.0 | : | : | 4 | : | |
Slovakia | 0.0 | 0.0 | 91.3 | 0.0 | 8.7 | 23 | 0 | |
Finland | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 61 | 4 | |
Sweden | 1 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 97.7 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 214 | 1 |
United Kingdom | 6 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 98.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 2478 | 58 |
Croatia | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | : | 50 | 0 | |
Turkey | : | : | : | : | : | : | : | |
Norway | 7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6 | 0 |
Total | 3.0 | 1.0 | 93.6 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 12870 | 478 |
: Indicates no data are available.
Percentages are of clients whose route of administration is known (n)
1 - Data are from 2010.
2 - In 2010 around 27% of all clients and 32% of new clients were registered as not known / missing for the primary drug category. Caution should be made when comparing data over time.
3 - In 2010 Latvia submitted a new dataset with a more precise TDI EMCDDA definition. Caution should be made when comparing data with previous years.
4 - Data are from 2010. Data presented in the table come from TDI pilot project. Caution should be made when interpreting the data.
5 - In 2010 came into implementation a new national information system implying methodological changes particularly in the registration criteria. Caution should be made when comparing 2010 data with previous years.
6 - Data are from 1st of April 2010 to 31st March 2011.
7 - In Norway the criteria for selecting and grouping cases are main ICD-10 diagnosis codes F11-F16 and F18-F19.
For more information relative to the treatment centre type, please see Table TDI-7.
See also 'General notes for interpreting data' on the Explanatory notes and help page.
Reitox national reports 2012 — TDI — outpatient treatment centres.