Country | Inject | Smoke/inhale | Eat/drink | Sniff | Others | Route known (n) | Route unknown | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Belgium | 4.6 | 0.8 | 18.5 | 76.1 | 0.0 | 238 | 13 | |
Bulgaria | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 66.7 | 0.0 | 3 | 0 | |
Czech Republic | 57.1 | 5.0 | 1.3 | 36.6 | 0.0 | 380 | 11 | |
Denmark | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9.4 | 90.6 | 0.0 | 127 | 26 | |
Germany | 0.8 | 10.3 | 36.7 | 50.8 | 1.3 | 5922 | : | |
Estonia | 50.0 | 37.5 | 12.5 | : | : | 8 | : | |
Ireland | 1 | 7.9 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 42.1 | 0.0 | 38 | 1 |
Greece | 9.1 | 18.2 | 45.5 | 27.3 | 0.0 | 11 | 0 | |
Spain | 1 | 0.5 | 5.5 | 35.1 | 58.5 | 0.5 | 402 | 8 |
France | : | 54.7 | 31.1 | 12.3 | 1.9 | 106 | 3 | |
Italy | 2 | 0.0 | 19.1 | 62.6 | 12.2 | 6.1 | 131 | 0 |
Cyprus | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4 | 0 | |
Latvia | 3 | 53.8 | 2.2 | 15.1 | 29.0 | 0.0 | 93 | 15 |
Lithuania | 60.0 | : | 40.0 | : | : | 5 | : | |
Luxembourg | : | : | : | : | : | : | : | |
Hungary | 18.3 | 6.0 | 23.7 | 52.0 | 0.0 | 367 | 6 | |
Malta | : | : | 50.0 | 50.0 | : | 8 | : | |
Netherlands | 0.7 | 3.0 | 30.4 | 65.9 | 0.0 | 299 | 196 | |
Austria | 4.8 | 0.0 | 30.2 | 65.1 | 0.0 | 63 | 4 | |
Poland | 4 | 6.3 | 14.6 | 6.3 | 68.8 | 4.2 | 48 | : |
Portugal | 5 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4 | 3 |
Romania | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | |
Slovenia | : | 50.0 | 50.0 | : | : | 2 | : | |
Slovakia | 25.6 | 15.2 | 0.8 | 58.4 | 0.0 | 125 | 3 | |
Finland | 50.0 | 0.0 | 33.3 | 16.7 | 0.0 | 24 | 1 | |
Sweden | 1 | 36.3 | 10.6 | 34.5 | 17.7 | 0.9 | 113 | 5 |
United Kingdom | 6 | 9.5 | 2.2 | 52.6 | 34.6 | 1.1 | 2501 | 117 |
Croatia | 0.0 | 0.0 | 44.4 | 55.6 | : | 36 | 0 | |
Turkey | : | : | : | : | : | : | : | |
Norway | : | : | : | : | : | : | : | |
Total | 6.7 | 7.9 | 37.2 | 47.1 | 1.1 | 11059 | 412 |
: Indicates no data are available.
Percentages are of clients whose route of administration is known (n)
1 - Data are from 2010.
2 - In 2010 around 27% of all clients and 32% of new clients were registered as not known / missing for the primary drug category. Caution should be made when comparing data over time.
3 - In 2010 Latvia submitted a new dataset with a more precise TDI EMCDDA definition. Caution should be made when comparing data with previous years.
4 - Data are from 2010. Data presented in the table come from TDI pilot project. Caution should be made when interpreting the data.
5 - In 2010 came into implementation a new national information system implying methodological changes particularly in the registration criteria. Caution should be made when comparing 2010 data with previous years.
6 - Data are from 1st of April 2010 to 31st March 2011.
For more information relative to the treatment centre type, please see Table TDI-7.
See also 'General notes for interpreting data' on the Explanatory notes and help page.
Reitox national reports 2012 — TDI — outpatient treatment centres.