Belgium | | Between 2003-2005, data refer to the number of offences and each offence is represented as one separate record in the database. |
---|
Since 2006 data refer to the number of offences and only the main offence: someone can have more than one drug in his/her possession; not only the main substance is mentioned. Offences without a specified substance are included.
These changes are likely to affect comparability across time. |
Bulgaria | | Based on the number of reports where cannabis is recorded as the main or other drug. |
---|
Czech Republic | | Based on the number of reports with cannabis as the main drug. Only criminal offences. |
---|
Germany | | Based on the number of reports with cannabis as the main drug. |
---|
For some offences a breakdown by drug is not available, and these offences are not recorded. |
Ireland | | Based on the number of reports with cannabis as the main drug. |
---|
Greece | | Based on the number of reports where cannabis is recorded as the main or other drug. |
---|
Spain | | Based on the number of reports where cannabis is recorded as the main or other drug. |
---|
France | | Based on the number of reports with cannabis as the main drug. |
---|
Italy | | Based on the number of reports where cannabis is recorded as the main or other drug. |
---|
For some offences a breakdown by drug is not available, and these offences are not recorded. |
Cyprus | | Based on the number of reports with cannabis as the main drug. |
---|
For some offences a breakdown by drug is not available, and these offences are not recorded. |
Latvia | | Based on all drug offences. Several different drug offences may be involved in one criminal case. |
---|
Lithuania | | Based on the number of reports where cannabis is recorded as the main or other drug. |
---|
For some offences a breakdown by drug is not available, and these offences are not recorded. |
Luxembourg | | Based on the number of reports where cannabis is recorded as the main or other drug. |
---|
Calculated on arrests for presumed offences against the 1973 drug law. |
Hungary | | Based on the number of reports with cannabis as the main drug. |
---|
Malta | | Based on the number of reports with cannabis as the main drug. |
---|
Netherlands | | Data refer to cases registered by the Public Prosecutor. |
---|
Austria | | Based on the number of reports where cannabis is recorded as the main or other drug. |
---|
Poland | | Based on the number of reports with cannabis as the main drug. |
---|
Portugal | | For some offences a breakdown by drug is not available, and these offences are not recorded. |
---|
Since July 2001 drug use and possession for use have been decriminalized and made an administrative offence. Data on such offences, although included in this table, come from a different monitoring system. 2001 data should be treated with caution since this new monitoring system was being tested for the first time. |
Slovenia | | Based on the number of reports with cannabis as the main drug. |
---|
Slovakia | | Based on the number of reports where cannabis is recorded as the main or other drug. |
---|
Sweden | | Based on the number of reports where cannabis is reported, as main or other drug. |
---|
Calculated on persons given a summary fine by the prosecutor or sentenced by a court. |
United Kingdom | | Based on the number of reports where cannabis is reported, as main or other drug. |
---|
Previous data has been on an offender (person basis). Since 2005 data are based on an all drug offence basis, except for Northern Ireland, which continues to be on a principal drug (i.e person) basis. |
Croatia | | Based on the number of reports where cannabis is recorded as the main or other drug. |
---|
Turkey | | Based on the number of reports with cannabis as the main drug. |
---|
After 2002 data refer to all data reported by the main prosecuting authorities (police, gendarmerie, customs).
This change is likely to affect comparability across time. |